Verdict
Built from the measurements below
- Muse Wonder is more accurate: 78.8% against 41.2% on the same 80 questions, a 37.5-point gap that is statistically significant.
- Llama 4 Scout is 58× cheaper per question as billed ($0.00037 vs $0.021), reasoning tokens included.
- Muse Wonder generates text 11× faster: 175 tokens per second against 15.
- Llama 4 Scout starts answering sooner: 1.2 s to the first token, against 16.1 s for Muse Wonder.
- Llama 4 Scout accepts more context: 1.3M tokens against 1M.
Which should you choose?
Choose Llama 4 Scout for the lower cost per correct answer ($0.0009 against $0.027), a quicker first token, open weights you can run yourself and a 1.3M-token context window. Choose Muse Wonder for the most accurate answers of the two and faster streaming. The widest subject gap is in engineering: Muse Wonder answered 11 of 15 correctly, Llama 4 Scout 2 of 15. With so few questions per subject, treat this as a lead to test on your own prompts, not a result.
Accuracy gap -37.5 points (z = -4.84). We call a winner only when z is at least 1.96, the usual 95% threshold. Speed, latency and price need a 10% margin.