Data as of · 78 models, 80 questions · reviewed by LLM Verifications team · methodology

Models · tested 27 Oct 2026

Compare AI models: accuracy, speed, latency and price

78 language models from 28 labs, all called through the same public API with the same questions and speed runs. Select a model for its full results, compare any two, or see the best open-weights models.

Accuracy

Share of 80 questions answered correctly. Every model gets the same questions.

Verification score

Share of 80 questions answered correctly · higher is better

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.585.0
  2. 2Gemini 4 Argon84.8
  3. 3GPT-5.3-Codex82.5
  4. 3Gemini 3.8 Flash82.5
  5. 5Claude Fable 5.181.2
  6. 6Grok 4.780.0
  7. 7Muse Wonder78.8
  8. 7Claude Sonnet 5.578.8
  9. 9Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview77.5
  10. 9Muse Spark Open77.5
  11. 9Kimi K3.1 Pro77.5
  12. 12GPT-6 Astra76.2
  13. 12GPT-6.1 Terra Pro76.2
  14. 12GPT-6.1 Sol76.2
  15. 15GPT-5.6 Terra75.0
  16. 15Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite75.0
  17. 15Qwen3.8 Max (0902)75.0
  18. 18GPT-6.1 Terra73.8
  19. 18DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 101773.8
  20. 18GPT-6 Sol73.8

52 more models · see the full leaderboard

Score vs. cost per question

Filled dots: no cheaper model scores as high

Most attractive quadrant0255075100$0.00001$0.0001$0.001$0.01$0.10Cost per question (USD, log) →Verification score (%) →Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BCommand AReka Flash 3Gemma 4 26B A4BGemma 4 31BQwen3.5 397B A17BHermes 4 405BMuse WonderGrok 4.7o3gpt-oss-20bGranite 4.0 MicroNova Micro 1.0Mercury 2.5Phi 4Granite 4.2 8BHy3GLM 5.3 FlashSolar Pro 4Trinity Large ThinkingMiniMax M3Mistral Large 4Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 SolGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.4GPT-6 LunaLlama 4 Maverick

Results by category

Questions answered correctly in each category

ModelScoreScience30 questionsEngineering15 questionsMedicine11 questionsEconomics9 questionsLaw6 questionsHumanities & social science9 questions
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic85.028/3012/157/118/95/68/9
Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle84.825/3013/147/118/96/68/9
GPT-5.3-CodexOpenAI82.528/3011/157/118/94/68/9
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle82.526/3012/156/118/96/68/9
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic81.225/3013/157/117/95/68/9
Grok 4.7SpaceXAI80.027/3011/156/118/94/68/9
Muse WonderMeta78.826/3011/155/118/94/69/9
Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic78.824/3013/157/118/93/68/9
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle77.526/3010/157/118/93/68/9
Muse Spark OpenMeta77.525/3011/156/118/94/68/9
Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotAI77.526/3011/156/118/93/68/9
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI76.226/3010/156/118/93/68/9
GPT-6.1 Terra ProOpenAI76.226/3010/156/118/93/68/9
GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI76.227/3010/155/118/93/68/9
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI75.026/3011/154/117/94/68/9
Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle75.023/3010/157/117/94/69/9
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen75.024/309/156/118/94/69/9
GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI73.826/309/156/117/93/68/9
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek73.826/309/154/117/94/69/9
GPT-6 SolOpenAI73.827/308/155/117/94/68/9

Cost

What it actually cost to run each model, billed by OpenRouter, next to the list price. Reasoning tokens are billed as output, so models that think longer cost more per question.

Cost per question

Average billed USD per question, reasoning included · lower is better

  1. 1Granite 4.0 Micro$0.000051
  2. 2gpt-oss-20b$0.000066
  3. 3Granite 4.2 8B$0.000077
  4. 4Nova Micro 1.0$0.000087
  5. 5Mercury 2.5$0.00011
  6. 6Phi 4$0.00012
  7. 7gpt-oss-120b$0.00013
  8. 8GLM 5.3 Flash$0.00015
  9. 9Ministral 3 3B 2512$0.00019
  10. 10GPT-6 Luna$0.00025
  11. 11Ministral 3 8B 2512$0.00027
  12. 12Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.00031
  13. 13Llama 4 Scout$0.00037
  14. 14Inkling Small$0.00047
  15. 15Claude Haiku 5.5$0.00048
  16. 16Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.00049
  17. 17Solar Mini 4$0.00053
  18. 18Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.00053
  19. 19MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.00056
  20. 20Llama 4 Maverick$0.00059

52 more models · see the full leaderboard

List price per 1M output tokens

OpenRouter list price · lower is cheaper

  1. 1gpt-oss-20b$0.018 in$0.09
  2. 2Ministral 3 3B 2512$0.1 in$0.1
  3. 3Granite 4.0 Micro$0.017 in$0.112
  4. 4Nova Micro 1.0$0.035 in$0.14
  5. 5Phi 4$0.07 in$0.14
  6. 6Mercury 2.5$0.04 in$0.15
  7. 7Ministral 3 8B 2512$0.15 in$0.15
  8. 8Ling 3.0 Flash VL$0.06 in$0.18
  9. 9Reka Flash 3$0.1 in$0.2
  10. 10Solar Mini 4$0.05 in$0.2
  11. 11Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.07 in$0.2
  12. 12Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.2 in$0.2
  13. 13Ling 3.1 Flash$0.075 in$0.225
  14. 14Granite 4.2 8B$0.06 in$0.25
  15. 15MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.14 in$0.28
  16. 16Llama 4 Scout$0.1 in$0.3
  17. 17Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.09 in$0.3
  18. 18Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.1 in$0.32
  19. 19Gemma 4 31B$0.2 in$0.4
  20. 20Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.15 in$0.5

Speed

Output tokens per second after the first token, median of 3 streamed runs of the same prompt.

Output speed

Median output tokens per second · higher is better

  1. 1Nemotron 3.5 Super VL715
  2. 2Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite409
  3. 3Trinity Large Thinking329
  4. 4Ministral 3 3B 2512252
  5. 5Qwen3.5 397B A17B240
  6. 6Inkling Small233
  7. 7Muse Spark Open220
  8. 8Claude Haiku 5.5192
  9. 9Nova Micro 1.0180
  10. 10Muse Wonder175
  11. 11Gemma 4 26B A4B172
  12. 12Mistral Small 4170
  13. 13DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp170
  14. 14o3163
  15. 15Mercury 2.5157
  16. 16GLM 5.3154
  17. 17Mistral Medium 3.5145
  18. 18Gemini 3.8 Flash142
  19. 19GPT-6 Luna137
  20. 20Kimi K2.7 Code136

52 more models · see the full leaderboard

Output speed vs. cost per question

Fast and cheap sits top left

Most attractive quadrant0200400600800$0.00001$0.0001$0.001$0.01$0.10Cost per question (USD, log) →Output speed (tok/s) →Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3.5 397B A17BMuse WonderGrok 4.7o3gpt-oss-20bMinistral 3 3B 2512Nova Micro 1.0Trinity Large ThinkingInkling SmallGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMuse Spark OpenGPT-6 Luna

Latency

Seconds from sending a request to receiving the first token. Reasoning models think before answering, and that time counts.

Time to first token

Median seconds to the first token · lower is better

  1. 1Ministral 3 3B 25120.3 s
  2. 2Ministral 3 8B 25120.3 s
  3. 3Hermes 4 405B0.3 s
  4. 4Kimi K2.7 Code0.4 s
  5. 5MiMo-V2.6-Flash0.4 s
  6. 6Qwen3.6 35B A3B0.4 s
  7. 7Qwen3 Coder Next0.4 s
  8. 8Mistral Medium 3.50.5 s
  9. 9Phi 40.5 s
  10. 10Nova Micro 1.00.5 s
  11. 11Reka Flash 30.5 s
  12. 12Mistral Small 40.5 s
  13. 13Nemotron 3.5 Lightning0.5 s
  14. 14Muse Spark Open0.5 s
  15. 15GLM 5.3 Flash0.5 s
  16. 16Inkling Small0.5 s
  17. 17MiniMax M30.5 s
  18. 18MiniMax M3.1 Flash0.5 s
  19. 19Qwen3.8 27B0.5 s
  20. 20gpt-oss-120b0.5 s

54 more models · see the full leaderboard

Latency vs. output speed

Quick to start and fast to finish sits top left

Most attractive quadrant02004006008000.0 s5.0 s10.0 s15.0 s20.0 sTime to first token (s) →Output speed (tok/s) →Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3.5 397B A17BMuse WonderMinistral 3 3B 2512Trinity Large ThinkingGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 3.8 FlashGemini 4 Argon

End-to-end response time

Seconds from sending the request to receiving the last token of a full answer of about 300 words: waiting, thinking and writing combined.

End-to-end response time

Median seconds for the full answer · lower is better

  1. 1Nemotron 3.5 Super VL1.5 s
  2. 2Ministral 3 3B 25121.6 s
  3. 3Nova Micro 1.02.1 s
  4. 4Trinity Large Thinking2.7 s
  5. 5Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite2.8 s
  6. 6DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp3.2 s
  7. 7Muse Spark Open3.2 s
  8. 8GLM 5.33.4 s
  9. 9Ministral 3 8B 25123.5 s
  10. 10Qwen3.5 397B A17B3.5 s
  11. 11Inkling Small3.6 s
  12. 12Nemotron 3 Ultra3.6 s
  13. 13Claude Haiku 5.53.9 s
  14. 14o33.9 s
  15. 15gpt-oss-20b4.0 s
  16. 16MiniMax M3.1 Flash4.2 s
  17. 17Qwen3 Coder Next4.2 s
  18. 18MiniMax M34.2 s
  19. 19GPT-6 Luna4.3 s
  20. 20GPT-6 Sol4.4 s

54 more models · see the full leaderboard

Score vs. end-to-end response time

Accurate and quick sits top left

Most attractive quadrant02550751000 s25 s50 s75 s100 sEnd-to-end response time (s) →Verification score (%) →Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BCommand AReka Flash 3Llama 4 ScoutGemma 4 26B A4BLing 3.1 FlashHermes 4 405BClaude Fable 5.1Muse WonderGranite 4.0 MicroSolar Pro 4DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Mistral Large 4Claude Opus 5.5Llama 4 Maverick

Context window

The most tokens of input and output a model accepts in one request, from OpenRouter's catalogue. A larger window fits longer documents and conversations.

Score vs. context window

Accurate with room for long inputs sits top right

Most attractive quadrant025507510010k100k1M10MContext window (tokens, log) →Verification score (%) →InklingQwen3.8 2.4T A95BReka Flash 3Llama 4 ScoutGemma 4 26B A4BGemma 4 31BHermes 4 405BGrok 4.7o3GPT-5.3-Codexgpt-oss-20bNova Micro 1.0Mercury 2.5Phi 4Solar Mini 4Granite 4.2 8BMinistral 3 14B 2512MiMo-V2.6-FlashLlama 3.3 70B InstructHy3GLM 5.3 FlashMiniMax M3Nemotron 3 UltraGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMistral Large 4Claude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.8 FlashGemini 4 ArgonGPT-5.4gpt-oss-120b

All models

Every model in one table. Select a column heading to sort.

All models compared
FeaturesAccuracyPriceSpeedLatencyEnd-to-end
#
1Claude Opus 5.51MAnthropic85.0$0.015$4 / $201292.3 s7.6 s
2Gemini 4 Argon1MGoogle84.8$0.0063$2 / $10693.3 s9.9 s
3GPT-5.3-Codex400kOpenAI82.5$0.01$1.75 / $14951.4 s5.2 s
4Gemini 3.8 Flash1MGoogle82.5$0.0037$0.825 / $4.1251423.2 s5.6 s
5Claude Fable 5.11MAnthropic81.2$0.016$10 / $50702.1 s11.0 s
6Grok 4.7500kSpaceXAI80.0$0.025$2 / $6771.9 s8.0 s
7Muse Wonder1MMeta78.8$0.021$4 / $2017516.1 s20.8 s
8Claude Sonnet 5.51MAnthropic78.8$0.0054$2 / $101260.7 s6.2 s
9Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview1MGoogle77.5$0.017$2 / $121243.4 s8.9 s
10Muse Spark Open1MMeta77.5$0.0045$1.25 / $4.252200.5 s3.2 s
11Kimi K3.1 Pro1MMoonshotAI77.5$0.01$2 / $10381.3 s19.6 s
12GPT-6 Astra1.1MOpenAI76.2$0.013$10 / $50491.3 s8.9 s
13GPT-6.1 Terra Pro1.1MOpenAI76.2$0.005$1 / $5—8.5 s9.0 s
14GPT-6.1 Sol1.1MOpenAI76.2$0.0029$2 / $10412.1 s10.8 s
15GPT-5.6 Terra1.1MOpenAI75.0$0.0063$2 / $121011.1 s5.3 s
16Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite1MGoogle75.0$0.0034$0.3 / $2.54091.1 s2.8 s
17Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1MQwen75.0$0.011$2 / $6461.2 s12.2 s
18GPT-6.1 Terra1.1MOpenAI73.8$0.0013$1 / $51222.4 s5.8 s
19DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 10171MDeepSeek73.8$0.00091$0.15 / $0.6570.9 s7.3 s
20GPT-6 Sol1.1MOpenAI73.8$0.0024$2 / $10920.9 s4.4 s
21o3200kOpenAI72.5$0.0088$2 / $81631.2 s3.9 s
22GPT-5.41.1MOpenAI72.5$0.011$2.5 / $15551.7 s8.7 s
23GPT-6 Luna1.1MOpenAI72.5$0.00025$0.1 / $0.51371.2 s4.3 s
24DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp1MDeepSeek71.2$0.0011$0.2156 / $0.64681700.7 s3.2 s
25DeepSeek V4 Pro 08131MDeepSeek71.2$0.0036$1.32 / $3.96560.8 s10.1 s
26Claude Haiku 5.51MAnthropic68.8$0.00048$0.1 / $0.51920.7 s3.9 s
27MiMo-V2.6-Pro1.1MXiaomi68.8$0.002$0.435 / $0.87580.7 s7.9 s
28GLM 5.3 Flash1MZ.ai67.5$0.00015$0.15 / $0.5830.5 s7.4 s
29Inkling Small524kThinking Machines67.5$0.00047$0.45 / $1.22330.5 s3.6 s
30GLM 5.31MZ.ai67.5$0.00093$0.079 / $1.41540.8 s3.4 s
31Inkling524kThinking Machines66.2$0.0012$1 / $4.051180.6 s5.0 s
32MiniMax M3.1 Flash1MMiniMax66.2$0.00087$0.15 / $0.61310.5 s4.2 s
33Kimi K2.7 Code262kMoonshotAI65.0$0.006$0.56 / $3.11360.4 s5.3 s
34Step 5 Preview1MStepFun63.8$0.0047$1 / $2.7930.6 s8.2 s
35Qwen3.8 27B1MQwen63.8$0.0043$0.2 / $2.5490.5 s10.6 s
36MiMo-V2.6-Flash1.1MXiaomi62.5$0.00056$0.14 / $0.28770.4 s5.4 s
37Qwen3 Coder Next262kQwen62.5$0.0017$0.12 / $0.81060.4 s4.2 s
38Qwen3.7 Plus1MQwen60.0$0.0033$0.32 / $1.28621.1 s12.4 s
39Nemotron 3 Ultra262kNVIDIA60.0$0.0057$0.6 / $2.41360.8 s3.6 s
40Llama 4 Maverick524kMeta59.0$0.00059$0.1875 / $0.6525130.7 s27.9 s
41Hy3262kTencent58.8$0.0012$0.132 / $0.528961.7 s9.0 s
42gpt-oss-120b131kOpenAI58.8$0.00013$0.15 / $0.6820.5 s5.4 s
43Mercury 2.5260kInception58.2$0.00011$0.04 / $0.151572.3 s6.5 s
44Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B1MQwen57.5$0.015$2 / $6443.1 s14.8 s
45MiniMax M31MMiniMax57.5$0.0026$0.3 / $1.21210.5 s4.2 s
46gpt-oss-20b131kOpenAI51.2$0.000066$0.018 / $0.091030.7 s4.0 s
47Mistral Large 41MMistral50.0$0.011$1.36 / $4.18831.1 s9.5 s
48LongCat 2.01MMeituan48.8$0.0032$0.3 / $1.2671.4 s10.0 s
49Command A256kCohere45.0$0.007$2.5 / $1071.8 s53.4 s
50Solar Pro 4524kUpstage45.0$0.0018$0.15 / $0.6910.6 s8.3 s
51Nemotron 3.5 Lightning262kNVIDIA43.8$0.00049$0.07 / $0.21160.5 s6.5 s
52Ministral 3 8B 2512262kMistral42.5$0.00027$0.15 / $0.151240.3 s3.5 s
53Llama 3.3 70B Instruct131kMeta42.5$0.00053$0.1 / $0.32420.7 s8.8 s
54Llama 4 Scout1.3MMeta41.2$0.00037$0.1 / $0.3151.2 s25.6 s
55Ling 3.1 Flash262kinclusionAI41.2$0.00061$0.075 / $0.22571.1 s81.3 s
56Phi 416kMicrosoft41.2$0.00012$0.07 / $0.141030.5 s4.9 s
57Solar Mini 4524kUpstage41.2$0.00053$0.05 / $0.21070.7 s7.4 s
58Nemotron 3.5 Super VL1MNVIDIA40.0$0.0013$0.15 / $0.57150.6 s1.5 s
59Qwen3.6 35B A3B262kQwen37.5$0.0037$0.1 / $0.951350.4 s5.6 s
60Granite 4.2 8B131kIBM36.2$0.000077$0.06 / $0.25600.6 s7.3 s
61Ministral 3 14B 2512262kMistral33.8$0.00031$0.2 / $0.2320.6 s12.7 s
62Qwen3.5 397B A17B262kQwen32.5$0.013$0.5 / $3.62400.6 s3.5 s
63Mistral Small 4262kMistral32.5$0.0019$0.15 / $0.61700.5 s4.5 s
64Gemma 4 31B262kGoogle30.0$0.0014$0.2 / $0.4580.6 s12.6 s
65Mistral Medium 3.5262kMistral28.8$0.025$1.5 / $7.51450.5 s5.4 s
66Trinity Large Thinking262kArcee AI28.8$0.0025$0.25 / $0.83290.6 s2.7 s
67Hermes 4 405B131kNous26.2$0.01$1 / $3410.3 s17.5 s
68Ministral 3 3B 2512131kMistral26.2$0.00019$0.1 / $0.12520.3 s1.6 s
69Granite 4.0 Micro131kIBM25.0$0.000051$0.017 / $0.112380.7 s8.9 s
70Nova Micro 1.0128kAmazon22.5$0.000087$0.035 / $0.141800.5 s2.1 s
71Gemma 4 26B A4B262kGoogle15.0$0.0011$0.09 / $0.31720.7 s4.8 s
72Reka Flash 366krekaai1.2$0.0008$0.1 / $0.21010.5 s7.4 s
73LFM2.5-2.6B128kLiquidAI——$0.35 / $0.5———
74Ling 3.0 Flash VL131kinclusionAI——$0.06 / $0.18———
75Qwen3.5-122B-A10B262kQwen——$0.4 / $3.21081.2 s18.0 s
76Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking262kQwen——$0.15 / $1.2———
77Nova Premier 1.01MAmazon——$2.5 / $12.5———
78GPT-5.5 Pro1.1MOpenAI——$30 / $180—33.8 s35.4 s

Frequently asked questions

Which AI model is the most accurate?
Claude Opus 5.5 by Anthropic scored highest in our 2026-10-27 run, answering 68 of 80 questions correctly (85.0%), out of 78 models tested.
Which AI model is the fastest?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA had the highest median output speed in our 2026-10-27 run: 715 tokens per second.
Which AI model is the cheapest to run?
Granite 4.0 Micro by IBM had the lowest billed cost per question in our 2026-10-27 run: $0.000051, reasoning tokens included.
Which AI model responds the quickest?
Ministral 3 3B 2512 by Mistral had the shortest median time to first token in our 2026-10-27 run: 0.3 s.
Which AI model gives a complete answer the quickest?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA had the shortest median end-to-end time in our 2026-10-27 run: 1.5 seconds to stream a full answer of about 300 words.
Which AI model has the largest context window?
Llama 4 Scout by Meta accepts the most context of the models we test: 1,310,720 tokens, according to OpenRouter's catalogue.
What is the best open-weights AI model?
Muse Spark Open by Meta has the highest verification score among open-weights models we test: 77.5%.
How many AI models do you compare?
78 models from 28 labs, each tested through OpenRouter with the same questions and speed runs.