Verdict
Built from the measurements below
- Accuracy is too close to call: MiMo-V2.6-Flash scored 62.5% and Qwen3 Coder Next 62.5% on the same 80 questions, a gap within what chance alone could produce.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3.0× cheaper per question as billed ($0.00056 vs $0.0017), reasoning tokens included.
- Qwen3 Coder Next generates text 1.4× faster: 106 tokens per second against 77.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.1M tokens against 262k.
Which should you choose?
Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash for the lower cost per correct answer ($0.0009 against $0.0027), a 1.1M-token context window and more hosts to choose from on OpenRouter (10 against 1). Choose Qwen3 Coder Next for faster streaming. The widest subject gap is in humanities & social science: Qwen3 Coder Next answered 9 of 9 correctly, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 7 of 9. With so few questions per subject, treat this as a lead to test on your own prompts, not a result.
Accuracy gap +0.0 points (z = 0.00). We call a winner only when z is at least 1.96, the usual 95% threshold. Speed, latency and price need a 10% margin.